Difference between revisions of "How Does the War in Ukraine End"

From EECH Central
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<p>As of this writing, the superforecasters had assigned a roughly 70 percent probability to the scenario of Russia and Ukraine not agreeing to end the conflict before October 1, 2024, the furthest-out date among the multiple-choice options presented. When the superforecasters were asked to name the year in which they expected Russia’s war against Ukraine to end, the median answer was 2025, with a minimum of 2024 and a maximum of 2037. There are no certain answers to my questions, just ones contingent on unknowable future circumstances. To put a twist on an old Yiddish expression, people predict, and war laughs. At some point, Ukraine will have to decide if there's a military solution to the conflict or if it has to look for another way out without conceding any kind of defeat, Barrons said.</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><p>But what Snyder envisions is Putin prioritizing his political survival in Russia over his personal and ideological designs on Ukraine, not necessarily Putin’s removal from power. In the United States, he noted, everything from industrial policy to diplomatic and military strategy to domestic politics similarly will need to be refashioned for this new conflict. “One may imagine something like the outcome of the Korean War,” with “the warring sides remaining not reconciled and irreconcilable, always on alert, but more or less securely divided,” Lipman told me. Still, she said, whatever border is drawn between Russia and Ukraine is likely to be far longer and harder to secure than the one dividing the Korean peninsula.</p><br /><br /><h2>When will the war in Ukraine end? Experts offer their predictions.</h2><br /><br /><p>Russia has shown zero interest in making concessions that would come close to the minimal requirements of Ukraine and its allies. As long as his military avoids total collapse, and he believes there is a chance of political change in the West, Putin will likely keep sacrificing Russians to stay in the fight. One problem, of course, is that Putin understands these stakes all too well — especially given the surging poll numbers for Trump, who has suggested both that he’d swiftly cut a deal with Russia over Ukraine and order the U.S. to depart from, or at least downgrade, NATO. Militarily, the biggest concern may be that Putin could go on the offensive in the spring with major air support that he’s avoided until now but could deploy as Ukraine runs low on defensive missiles.</p><br /><br /><ul><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>This means that the willingness of the general population to suffer in the face of high costs is of the utmost importance.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>In practice the problem was that the Ukrainians had been encouraged to embrace a western manoeuvre concept but without the capacity to make it work, which left them too dependent on the Russian army being in a weakened and demoralised state.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>Ukraine is under full-scale Russian invasion and is fighting for its very survival.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>Otherwise he would be stuck with many more months of war without tangible progress and a growing sense of futility.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>“If leaders explain the stakes and the costs, this is a manageable burden,” he told me.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>Second, he controls the state media apparatus and has censored other media organisations, limiting the information available to the general public.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br /> <br /><br /> <br /><br /></ul><br /><br /><p>President Putin could seek to regain more parts of Russia's former empire by sending troops into ex-Soviet republics like Moldova and Georgia, that are not part of Nato. Mr Putin could declare Western arms supplies to Ukrainian forces are an act of aggression that warrant retaliation. [https://gilliam-albrechtsen-4.technetbloggers.de/ukraine-russia-war-latest-hungary-signals-major-shift-in-ukraine-funding-stance-russia-claims-it-has-taken-control-of-kharkiv-village-1707600485 https://gilliam-albrechtsen-4.technetbloggers.de/ukraine-russia-war-latest-hungary-signals-major-shift-in-ukraine-funding-stance-russia-claims-it-has-taken-control-of-kharkiv-village-1707600485] could threaten to send troops into the Baltic states - which are members of Nato - such as Lithuania, to establish a land corridor with the Russian coastal exclave of Kaliningrad. When I asked the official who wanted to remain anonymous about recent tactical gains in the east, including a handful of small villages, he lifted his hand with his finger and thumb pinching the air perhaps half an inch apart.</p><br /><br /><h3>Find peace</h3><br /><br /><p>The Kremlin maintains that elections are fair and he is genuinely popular. But Peskov told Bloomberg News, "President Putin has stated numerous times that Russia was, is and will continue to be open for negotiations on Ukraine." "We are unaware of the shifts in Russia's position described," US National Security Council spokeswoman Adrienne Watson said, per Bloomberg. The sources reportedly said that Putin could be willing to end his demands over Ukraine's neutrality and, eventually, his opposition to the country joining NATO. All one can say is that intense diplomatic activity can generate its own dynamic and could be a feature of 2024 largely absent from 2023.</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><p>He uses Russia's internal security forces to suppress that opposition. But this turns sour and enough members of Russia's military, political and economic elite turn against him. The West makes clear that if Putin goes and is replaced by a more moderate leader, then Russia will see the lifting of some sanctions and a restoration of normal diplomatic relations. But it may not be implausible if the people who have benefited from Mr Putin no longer believe he can defend their interests.</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><p>Offering Article 5 protection to Ukrainian territory in this fashion would be akin to admitting a divided Germany to NATO after World War II and to America’s security pact with South Korea after the armistice that halted the Korean War without reunifying the Korean Peninsula. This would be a defensive pact, but not a commitment to take direct part in any future offensive operations Ukraine might choose to undertake. Foreign policy wasn’t expected to play a major role in the 2024 campaign — especially as inflation surged in the first two years of Biden’s term and economists last year predicted a recession. That is a flashpoint for Putin, who is believed to be mainly interested in a strategic deal with Washington under which Ukraine will not enter NATO.</p><br /><br /><ul><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>The Ukrainian General Staff says its forces have repelled Russian attacks near Avdiivka itself, as well as from settlements to the north west, south west, and directly west of the town.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>But if Joe Biden is defeated in the US presidential election in 2024 by Donald Trump or another isolationist candidate, it could pose serious questions for Ukraine’s war effort.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>The Russian offensives at the start of the year were unimpressive with crude and unimaginative tactics.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br /> <br /><br /> <br /><br /></ul><br /><br /><p>"My aim is to change Russia. I may not be president on 17 March but I should have the best result." "He practically destroyed the key institutions of the modern state of Russia. My job will be to restore these institutions," said Mr Nadezhdin. Boris Nadezhdin told the BBC he was unlikely to win 17 March elections but Mr Putin would not last six more years. A would-be challenger to Russian President Vladimir Putin has said he would end the war in Ukraine on day one of his presidency. "We are determined to reach our goals. And would prefer to complete it by diplomatic means. If not, the military operation will be continued till we reach our goals," he added.</p><br /><br /><p>Research suggests that the path to war resembles a bargaining game, where countries compete over issues like territory and resources to patriotism or the style of governance. Rather than going to war, which is very costly, competing states prefer to settle these disagreements peacefully. Ideally, the two sides do this based upon their relative probabilities of winning a hypothetical war.</p><br /><br /><ul><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>Meanwhile, any prospect of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine look slim despite efforts to bring both sides to the negotiating table.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>The war in Ukraine conjures up a strong sense of historical déjà vu.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>"This is a tripwire that would trigger the might of all Nato, including the US, UK and France."</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>Prepare for the possibility of a long, shape-shifting conflict, perhaps lasting years, even a decade or more.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>Adding a democratic Ukraine in NATO would mark the utter and permanent defeat of Putin’s crusade to absorb it into a Russian empire.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br /> <br /><br /> <br /><br /></ul><br /><br /><p>Massive cyber-attacks sweep across Ukraine, targeting key national infrastructure. President Zelensky is either assassinated or flees, to western Ukraine or even overseas, to set up a government in exile. President Putin declares victory and withdraws some forces, leaving enough behind to maintain some control.</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><p>President Macron of France has spoken to President Putin on the phone. And, surprisingly, Russian and Ukrainian officials have met for talks on the border with Belarus. But, by agreeing to the talks, Putin seems to at least have accepted the possibility of a negotiated ceasefire. Russian forces may try to push again along the entire front, at least to secure all of the Donbas region. Ukraine will probably try to exploit the success it has had in re-establishing its control over the western Black Sea and its vital trade corridor to the Bosphorus. A Christmas Eve story in the New York Times claimed that Putin might be trying to find a way out.</p><br /><br /><p>Ukraine will do all it can to keep pressure on the Russians there to make it untenable for the Russian navy in Sevastopol, the handful of air force bases there and their logistics base at Dzankoy. It is in a fight for its survival and understands what Russia will do if it stops. More European nations are now talking about the need to step up aid in light of concerns that the US is weakening in its resolve. What happens on the battlefield becomes ultimately only the symptom of that struggle.</p><br /><br /><ul><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>The Ukrainians reverted to the sort of smaller-scale operations that they understood better.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>The fierce determination of the Ukrainian people up to this point suggests that this will not occur any time soon.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>In his October assessment, Snyder floated one scenario in which Ukrainian military victories prompt a power struggle in Moscow that leads Russia to withdraw from Ukraine, as Putin and his rivals judge that the armed forces loyal to them are most useful on the homefront.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>As for Ukraine's offensive, Mr Podolyak said the Wagner mutiny did not last long enough to influence the fighting along a front of 1,800 kilometres, the longest - he said - in any war since 1945.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br /> <br /><br /> <br /><br /></ul><br /><br /><p>As Russian tactics become more aggressive, the Ukrainian people are paying ever higher costs. If we see the average Ukrainian’s willingness to suffer and fight lagging, it should give us cause for concern. To this end, western governments have stepped up humanitarian and defensive aid to Ukraine, in order to ensure that Ukrainian support for the war endures.</p>
+
<p>It has delivered artillery, but not the longer-range rocket systems that Ukraine is asking for. Wars often do not end predictably, and a failure to achieve hoped-for victories often leads to a sudden change of government. Ukraine appears very dependent on Volodymyr Zelenskiy in terms of its public diplomacy, but he does not direct its military strategy in detail and the country’s desire to fight runs very deep.</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><p>The main reason for the assessment that it suits Putin to hang in there is that over time western support for Ukraine will drift away. Indeed, Putin was quite explicit about this in his press conference of 14 December. Ukraine has been unable to put itself in a position to force a decision on Russia. But even if the offensive had made more progress it would have been a tall order to put the Russians sufficiently in a corner that their choice was only between battlefield humiliation and a negotiated withdrawal. We also need to keep in mind that there have been some successes, including pushing back the Black Sea Fleet through the effective use of naval drones.</p><br /><br /><p>"This is a tripwire that would trigger the might of all Nato, including the US, UK and France." Nato defence chiefs have re-examined his lengthy speech of July 2021 and concluded they urgently need to reinforce Nato's eastern borders lest Putin is tempted to make a move on countries like Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Eastern European countries, who fear they may be next in Putin's sights, are watching nervously for any Russian manoeuvres close to their borders. Kusti Salm, the permanent secretary at Estonia's Ministry of Defence, is one of those pushing for more military assistance to Ukraine. "But it might not destroy the Ukrainian government - provided it has made plans to set up a new government HQ, most likely in the western part of the country."</p><br /><br /><h2>What History Says About Biden’s Power to Strike Back Against the Houthis</h2><br /><br /><p>Ukraine’s war reaches the one-year mark with no immediate end in sight. Both sides want to carry on fighting, and any negotiated peace looks a long way off. The Pentagon declined to say whether the GLSDB will be used to attack Russian targets in Crimea.</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><p>But it noted that US officials had said they were unaware of any such proposals and that they had no sign that the Russian president was serious about looking to bring his forces' invasion of Ukraine to a close. Commenting on an ongoing war is difficult, especially for someone not close to the front lines. This is why, as I noted in last year’s assessment, my preference is “to talk about trends, possibilities, and developments coming into view.” Wars pass through stages, as fortunes shift, and the challenges of supply and reinforcement change. Over time some possibilities become impossible, some quite likely, and new ones emerge. Of these the most unlikely, such as peace negotiations, can be worth discussing to understand why they are unlikely or what would need to change to make them likely.</p><br /><br /><h3>Simple guide to Ukraine crisis in maps</h3><br /><br /><p>However, what was not apparent to Russia until the fighting began is that the Ukrainian people are far more willing to fight than they anticipated. Ukraine's position between Russia to the east and countries such as Poland and Romania to the west means it straddles both the European and Russian spheres of influence. As the scale of the attack became clear, and the Ukrainian military worked to respond, many questioned whether the country would be able to resist the military might of its neighbour.</p><br /><br /><ul><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>The fog of war can obscure our view of who is winning, who is losing, and how long all of this will last.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>After visiting Kyiv last month he embraced the justice party, saying the West should help Ukraine “win” and “weaken” Russia.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>And they said winning will depend on a Congress with the resolve to ensure continued support to Ukraine.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>The occupation of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions will continue but a major Russian breakthrough like a drive from the south to Pavlograd to encircle the Ukrainian forces in the Donbas is less likely.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>Tom Malinowski was a Democratic member of Congress representing New Jersey’s 7th Congressional District from 2019 to 2023, and assistant secretary of State for democracy, human rights and labor in the Obama administration.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>Mr Danilov said they included security forces, officials and representatives of Russia's oligarchs, who believe that Mr Putin's decision to launch a full invasion of Ukraine in February last year has been a personal disaster for them as well as a threat to Russia.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br /> <br /><br /> <br /><br /></ul><br /><br /><p>Notably, in a reversal of perceptions a year ago, some experts could envision a decisive Ukrainian victory against Russia, but none forecasts a decisive Russian win against Ukraine. While some Western governments will secretly balk at the ongoing costs of supporting Ukraine (the U.S. has already pledged over $40 billion in security assistance to Kyiv) many understand the high stakes, Barrons said. Military experts warn that this means the war is likely to be prolonged, putting immense pressure on Ukraine to fight for several more years to come, potentially, and on its international partners to commit billions of dollars more in military, humanitarian and financial resources. Ukraine’s most important backer has yet to set out a clear objective, beyond strengthening Ukraine to give it a stronger bargaining hand. America has spent nearly $14bn on the war so far, and Congress has just allocated a further $40bn. America has rallied military donations from more than 40 other countries.</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><p>The Ukrainian Embassy in Washington told Defense News that Ukraine would not strike Russian territory with longer-range weapons pledged by the United States. Blumenthal has joined other lawmakers — particularly pro-Ukraine Republicans — in pushing President Joe Biden to give Zelenskyy most of the weapons he requested, including long-range ATACMS missiles and F-16 fighter aircraft. Army’s maneuver warfare school at Fort Benning, Georgia, said Western upgrades offer Ukraine the chance to dominate the close fight with Russian adversaries and conclude the tactical fighting to its advantage. Also in the mix is a pledge from France to ship AMX-10 RC light, wheeled tanks. But this winter, they’re expected to launch attacks across open plains, which would be harder to defeat, said Daniel Rice, a former U.S.</p><br /><br /><ul><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>And that has direct consequences for the future of the war in Ukraine.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>However, it is hard to imagine Russia striking very far west, given the painfully slow advance around Bakhmut and the catastrophic attempt to capture Vuhledar.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>"The price we pay is in money. While the price the Ukrainians pay is in blood. If authoritarian regimes see that force is rewarded we will all pay a much higher price. And the world will become a more dangerous world for all of us."</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>At the same time, if we’re honest, we have to acknowledge that Ukraine may not achieve total military success in the next year or two.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>Perhaps most significant is the activity around Avdiivka, a strategically important town on the front line in eastern Ukraine.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br /> <br /><br /> <br /><br /></ul><br /><br /><p>The money is coming through and Kyiv is still holding steady, battered and bruised but determined to resist Russian aggression. Putin can’t keep his forces on the offensive all year long and now has to keep an eye out for new Ukrainian strikes on assets not only in Crimea (such as the recent hit on a large landing ship in the Black Sea port of Feodosia in occupied Crimea) but also in Russia proper. Having to rely on Donald Trump both winning the November US election (the next major landmark event) and then doing what he wants is not wholly comfortable. There was, for example, a thread of continuity between the first and second world wars. To be sure, a lot happened in the intervening years that could have changed the direction of what followed.</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><p>Russia’s allies like China – which has been a lukewarm friend to Putin in his war against Ukraine – have also been unable, or unwilling, to force him to the negotiating table. BBC correspondent James Waterhouse said Russia had increased its artillery and air strikes as well as missile attacks - gaining ground mile by mile in Luhansk while the Ukrainians are forced to retreat. Russia's invasion plan has not gone entirely to plan - Britain's Defence Intelligence says hundreds of Russian troops have been killed and resistance is stiff - but it is progressing.</p><br /><br /><ul><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., made several concessions to those Ukraine aid skeptics to secure the votes to win his protracted speakership battle.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>The West could — as Ukraine has sought — supply even more sophisticated weapons, faster, in the hope of convincing Russia that it cannot win.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>Anything that generated any momentum would certainly change the context.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>It took 15 votes for McCarthy to secure the position, after which he appointed three Republicans who oppose Ukraine aid — Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Ralph Norman of South Carolina and Chip Roy of Texas — to the Rules Committee, which controls legislation and debate on the House floor.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>There were other commanders clearly unhappy with the higher conduct of the war.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br /> <br /><br /> <br /><br /></ul><br /><br /><p>For now, such cracks in the West are contained by the mantra that the future is for Ukrainians to decide. Yet Ukraine’s choices are in turn shaped by what the West will provide. We are as strong as you are united,” Mr Zelensky told a meeting at Davos.</p><br /><br /><ul><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>However, where this line is and if there are any viable alternatives that would better serve the interests of this coalition is questionable.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>But even if this occurs, that doesn’t mean the war itself will end with Putin’s downfall.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>Russia has launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, leaving millions of people fearing for their futures.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>In the long term, says Emmanuel Macron, the French president, Europe will need to find a way of living with Russia.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>As we learnt more it also became apparent that the demands of close coordination of complex operations in tough conditions were beyond fresh units that had not quite enough training.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br />  <br /><br /> <li>“The war has been so absolutely brutal that they’re fearful of what will happen in territories handed over to Russia,” he said.</li><br /><br />  <br /><br /> <br /><br /> <br /><br /></ul><br /><br /><p>The bill, which will funnel support to Ukraine for about the next five months, includes some $6bn budgeted for armoured vehicles and air defences. With no end in sight to the fighting, the US is sending more military, economic and humanitarian aid. The end of fighting in the southern port city of Mariupol has freed up Russian troops for redeployment elsewhere and allowed them to intensify their onslaught in the east. After eight years of fighting a Russian-backed breakaway insurgency in the east of their country they are now watching it being shelled, bombed and rocketed by their giant nuclear-armed neighbour. The Biden administration has said the war must end before Ukraine can join NATO, because it does not want to risk direct U.S. involvement.</p><br /><br /><p>Many were so badly beaten and abused in detention that this acted as a major deterrent to further protest. Resistance has already begun, with a nationwide call-up of men of fighting age and 18,000 automatic weapons being handed out to the citizens of Kyiv, in addition to the uniformed army and reserves who are already putting up stiff resistance. "In the short term," says Brig Ben Barry from the International Institute for Strategic Studies, "a successful Russian seizure of Kyiv would be a military and political success with strategic impact. President Putin has clearly spent months closeted in isolation, studying his defence chiefs' plans to take over his West-leaning Slavic neighbour and bring it back into Moscow's orbit.</p>

Latest revision as of 23:17, 23 April 2024

It has delivered artillery, but not the longer-range rocket systems that Ukraine is asking for. Wars often do not end predictably, and a failure to achieve hoped-for victories often leads to a sudden change of government. Ukraine appears very dependent on Volodymyr Zelenskiy in terms of its public diplomacy, but he does not direct its military strategy in detail and the country’s desire to fight runs very deep.







The main reason for the assessment that it suits Putin to hang in there is that over time western support for Ukraine will drift away. Indeed, Putin was quite explicit about this in his press conference of 14 December. Ukraine has been unable to put itself in a position to force a decision on Russia. But even if the offensive had made more progress it would have been a tall order to put the Russians sufficiently in a corner that their choice was only between battlefield humiliation and a negotiated withdrawal. We also need to keep in mind that there have been some successes, including pushing back the Black Sea Fleet through the effective use of naval drones.



"This is a tripwire that would trigger the might of all Nato, including the US, UK and France." Nato defence chiefs have re-examined his lengthy speech of July 2021 and concluded they urgently need to reinforce Nato's eastern borders lest Putin is tempted to make a move on countries like Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Eastern European countries, who fear they may be next in Putin's sights, are watching nervously for any Russian manoeuvres close to their borders. Kusti Salm, the permanent secretary at Estonia's Ministry of Defence, is one of those pushing for more military assistance to Ukraine. "But it might not destroy the Ukrainian government - provided it has made plans to set up a new government HQ, most likely in the western part of the country."



What History Says About Biden’s Power to Strike Back Against the Houthis



Ukraine’s war reaches the one-year mark with no immediate end in sight. Both sides want to carry on fighting, and any negotiated peace looks a long way off. The Pentagon declined to say whether the GLSDB will be used to attack Russian targets in Crimea.





But it noted that US officials had said they were unaware of any such proposals and that they had no sign that the Russian president was serious about looking to bring his forces' invasion of Ukraine to a close. Commenting on an ongoing war is difficult, especially for someone not close to the front lines. This is why, as I noted in last year’s assessment, my preference is “to talk about trends, possibilities, and developments coming into view.” Wars pass through stages, as fortunes shift, and the challenges of supply and reinforcement change. Over time some possibilities become impossible, some quite likely, and new ones emerge. Of these the most unlikely, such as peace negotiations, can be worth discussing to understand why they are unlikely or what would need to change to make them likely.



Simple guide to Ukraine crisis in maps



However, what was not apparent to Russia until the fighting began is that the Ukrainian people are far more willing to fight than they anticipated. Ukraine's position between Russia to the east and countries such as Poland and Romania to the west means it straddles both the European and Russian spheres of influence. As the scale of the attack became clear, and the Ukrainian military worked to respond, many questioned whether the country would be able to resist the military might of its neighbour.











  • The fog of war can obscure our view of who is winning, who is losing, and how long all of this will last.








  • After visiting Kyiv last month he embraced the justice party, saying the West should help Ukraine “win” and “weaken” Russia.








  • And they said winning will depend on a Congress with the resolve to ensure continued support to Ukraine.








  • The occupation of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions will continue but a major Russian breakthrough like a drive from the south to Pavlograd to encircle the Ukrainian forces in the Donbas is less likely.








  • Tom Malinowski was a Democratic member of Congress representing New Jersey’s 7th Congressional District from 2019 to 2023, and assistant secretary of State for democracy, human rights and labor in the Obama administration.








  • Mr Danilov said they included security forces, officials and representatives of Russia's oligarchs, who believe that Mr Putin's decision to launch a full invasion of Ukraine in February last year has been a personal disaster for them as well as a threat to Russia.










Notably, in a reversal of perceptions a year ago, some experts could envision a decisive Ukrainian victory against Russia, but none forecasts a decisive Russian win against Ukraine. While some Western governments will secretly balk at the ongoing costs of supporting Ukraine (the U.S. has already pledged over $40 billion in security assistance to Kyiv) many understand the high stakes, Barrons said. Military experts warn that this means the war is likely to be prolonged, putting immense pressure on Ukraine to fight for several more years to come, potentially, and on its international partners to commit billions of dollars more in military, humanitarian and financial resources. Ukraine’s most important backer has yet to set out a clear objective, beyond strengthening Ukraine to give it a stronger bargaining hand. America has spent nearly $14bn on the war so far, and Congress has just allocated a further $40bn. America has rallied military donations from more than 40 other countries.





The Ukrainian Embassy in Washington told Defense News that Ukraine would not strike Russian territory with longer-range weapons pledged by the United States. Blumenthal has joined other lawmakers — particularly pro-Ukraine Republicans — in pushing President Joe Biden to give Zelenskyy most of the weapons he requested, including long-range ATACMS missiles and F-16 fighter aircraft. Army’s maneuver warfare school at Fort Benning, Georgia, said Western upgrades offer Ukraine the chance to dominate the close fight with Russian adversaries and conclude the tactical fighting to its advantage. Also in the mix is a pledge from France to ship AMX-10 RC light, wheeled tanks. But this winter, they’re expected to launch attacks across open plains, which would be harder to defeat, said Daniel Rice, a former U.S.











  • And that has direct consequences for the future of the war in Ukraine.








  • However, it is hard to imagine Russia striking very far west, given the painfully slow advance around Bakhmut and the catastrophic attempt to capture Vuhledar.








  • "The price we pay is in money. While the price the Ukrainians pay is in blood. If authoritarian regimes see that force is rewarded we will all pay a much higher price. And the world will become a more dangerous world for all of us."








  • At the same time, if we’re honest, we have to acknowledge that Ukraine may not achieve total military success in the next year or two.








  • Perhaps most significant is the activity around Avdiivka, a strategically important town on the front line in eastern Ukraine.










The money is coming through and Kyiv is still holding steady, battered and bruised but determined to resist Russian aggression. Putin can’t keep his forces on the offensive all year long and now has to keep an eye out for new Ukrainian strikes on assets not only in Crimea (such as the recent hit on a large landing ship in the Black Sea port of Feodosia in occupied Crimea) but also in Russia proper. Having to rely on Donald Trump both winning the November US election (the next major landmark event) and then doing what he wants is not wholly comfortable. There was, for example, a thread of continuity between the first and second world wars. To be sure, a lot happened in the intervening years that could have changed the direction of what followed.





Russia’s allies like China – which has been a lukewarm friend to Putin in his war against Ukraine – have also been unable, or unwilling, to force him to the negotiating table. BBC correspondent James Waterhouse said Russia had increased its artillery and air strikes as well as missile attacks - gaining ground mile by mile in Luhansk while the Ukrainians are forced to retreat. Russia's invasion plan has not gone entirely to plan - Britain's Defence Intelligence says hundreds of Russian troops have been killed and resistance is stiff - but it is progressing.











  • House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., made several concessions to those Ukraine aid skeptics to secure the votes to win his protracted speakership battle.








  • The West could — as Ukraine has sought — supply even more sophisticated weapons, faster, in the hope of convincing Russia that it cannot win.








  • Anything that generated any momentum would certainly change the context.








  • It took 15 votes for McCarthy to secure the position, after which he appointed three Republicans who oppose Ukraine aid — Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Ralph Norman of South Carolina and Chip Roy of Texas — to the Rules Committee, which controls legislation and debate on the House floor.








  • There were other commanders clearly unhappy with the higher conduct of the war.










For now, such cracks in the West are contained by the mantra that the future is for Ukrainians to decide. Yet Ukraine’s choices are in turn shaped by what the West will provide. We are as strong as you are united,” Mr Zelensky told a meeting at Davos.











  • However, where this line is and if there are any viable alternatives that would better serve the interests of this coalition is questionable.








  • But even if this occurs, that doesn’t mean the war itself will end with Putin’s downfall.








  • Russia has launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, leaving millions of people fearing for their futures.








  • In the long term, says Emmanuel Macron, the French president, Europe will need to find a way of living with Russia.








  • As we learnt more it also became apparent that the demands of close coordination of complex operations in tough conditions were beyond fresh units that had not quite enough training.








  • “The war has been so absolutely brutal that they’re fearful of what will happen in territories handed over to Russia,” he said.










The bill, which will funnel support to Ukraine for about the next five months, includes some $6bn budgeted for armoured vehicles and air defences. With no end in sight to the fighting, the US is sending more military, economic and humanitarian aid. The end of fighting in the southern port city of Mariupol has freed up Russian troops for redeployment elsewhere and allowed them to intensify their onslaught in the east. After eight years of fighting a Russian-backed breakaway insurgency in the east of their country they are now watching it being shelled, bombed and rocketed by their giant nuclear-armed neighbour. The Biden administration has said the war must end before Ukraine can join NATO, because it does not want to risk direct U.S. involvement.



Many were so badly beaten and abused in detention that this acted as a major deterrent to further protest. Resistance has already begun, with a nationwide call-up of men of fighting age and 18,000 automatic weapons being handed out to the citizens of Kyiv, in addition to the uniformed army and reserves who are already putting up stiff resistance. "In the short term," says Brig Ben Barry from the International Institute for Strategic Studies, "a successful Russian seizure of Kyiv would be a military and political success with strategic impact. President Putin has clearly spent months closeted in isolation, studying his defence chiefs' plans to take over his West-leaning Slavic neighbour and bring it back into Moscow's orbit.